Difference between revisions of "Talk:In Red"
(Created page with "'''''Repeating the first two songs:''''' To me it seems, that the bootlegers were copying the Floorshow EP for the first four songs. For some reason they missed to turn over ...") |
m (re) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | '''''Repeating the first two songs:''''' | + | [[File:The Final Floorshow Cover Back.jpg|thumb|300px|left]] |
| + | <br/> | ||
| + | '''''Repeating the first two songs:'''''<br/> | ||
| − | To me it seems, | + | To me it seems, the bootlegers were copying the ''Floorshow EP'' for the first four songs. <br/> |
| + | For some reason they missed to turn over the single from side B to side A while recording. <br/> | ||
| + | When they realised their mistake, it was already too late...<br/> | ||
| + | <br/> | ||
| + | [[The Final Floorshow]] bootleg has the same content? Can this be verified? <br/> | ||
| + | I think the track list variies slightly - check the picture on the left ... <br/> | ||
| − | [[The Final Floorshow]] | + | '''If''' [[The Final Floorshow]] does not contain these repeated songs, one could reason that ''In Red'' a missprinting of ''The Final Floorshow''.<br/> |
| − | + | <br/> | |
| + | '''''"The title In Red is not stated on the cover but has been adopted widely due to the colour of the print"'''''<br/> | ||
| − | + | I have one where it is printed on the spine.<br/> | |
| + | Are there different editions or did it just remain hidden? (The printing is, in fact, hard to see)<br/> | ||
| + | <br/> | ||
| + | [[User:Robertundbobi|Robertundbobi]] ([[User talk:Robertundbobi|talk]]) 17:57, 2 July 2016 (UTC)<br/> | ||
| + | <br/> | ||
| + | <br/> | ||
| + | <br/> | ||
| + | OK, we should check these issues propperly. I like your theory and might mention it on the side.<br/> | ||
| − | + | As to the spine ... I don't think there are different editions. Also I've changed the text accordingly.<br/> | |
| − | + | We just didn't have a picture of the spine so far and didn't know that the title was printed on there... ;-) ...<br/> | |
| + | <br/> | ||
| + | [[User:Being645|Being645]] ([[User talk:Being645|talk]]) 20:04, 3 July 2016 (UTC)<br/> | ||
| + | <br/> | ||
Latest revision as of 20:04, 3 July 2016
Repeating the first two songs:
To me it seems, the bootlegers were copying the Floorshow EP for the first four songs.
For some reason they missed to turn over the single from side B to side A while recording.
When they realised their mistake, it was already too late...
The Final Floorshow bootleg has the same content? Can this be verified?
I think the track list variies slightly - check the picture on the left ...
If The Final Floorshow does not contain these repeated songs, one could reason that In Red a missprinting of The Final Floorshow.
"The title In Red is not stated on the cover but has been adopted widely due to the colour of the print"
I have one where it is printed on the spine.
Are there different editions or did it just remain hidden? (The printing is, in fact, hard to see)
Robertundbobi (talk) 17:57, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
OK, we should check these issues propperly. I like your theory and might mention it on the side.
As to the spine ... I don't think there are different editions. Also I've changed the text accordingly.
We just didn't have a picture of the spine so far and didn't know that the title was printed on there... ;-) ...
Being645 (talk) 20:04, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
